Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Filter by Categories
Case Report
Case Series
Editorial
Guest Editorial
Letter to Editor
Original Article
Review Article
Technical Note
Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Filter by Categories
Case Report
Case Series
Editorial
Guest Editorial
Letter to Editor
Original Article
Review Article
Technical Note
Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Filter by Categories
Case Report
Case Series
Editorial
Guest Editorial
Letter to Editor
Original Article
Review Article
Technical Note
View/Download PDF

Translate this page into:

Original Article
3 (
2
); 89-97
doi:
10.25259/GJHSR_36_2025

Contraceptive use among women of reproductive age in Nigeria: A cross-sectional population-based survey (2011–2021)

Department of Research and Development, Fescosof Data Solutions, Ota, Ogun state, Nigeria.
Author image

*Corresponding author: Olaniyi Felix Sanni, Department of Research and Development, Fescosof Data Solutions, Ota, Ogun state, Nigeria. fescosofanalysis@gmail.com

Licence
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-Share Alike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, transform, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.

How to cite this article: Sanni OF, Sanni AE, Akeju OP, Onyeagwaibe CI, Ahamuefula T. Contraceptive use among women of reproductive age in Nigeria: A cross-sectional population-based survey (2011–2021). Glob J Health Sci Res. 2025;3:89-97. doi: 10.25259/GJHSR_36_2025

Abstract

Objectives:

Contraceptive use among women of reproductive age in Nigeria is crucial for improving reproductive health. Despite global advancements, barriers related to sociodemographic, cultural, and religious factors hinder access to family planning services. This study investigates trends and determinants of contraceptive use from 2011 to 2021, focusing on regional and sociodemographic disparities.

Material and Methods:

Data were sourced from Nigeria’s Multiple Indicator Cluster Surveys for 2011–2021. A retrospective cross-sectional analysis was performed on women of reproductive aged 15–49. Descriptive statistics assessed contraceptive prevalence. Logistic regression models evaluated associations between contraceptive use and sociodemographic factors such as age, marital status, education, wealth, and region.

Results:

Contraceptive use prevalence was 17.0%, with fluctuations from 19.6% in 2011 to 12.9% in 2017 and rising to 17.7% in 2021. Logistic regression revealed higher contraceptive use among older age groups (21–30 years, adjusted odds ratios [AORs] = 2.490), those with higher education (AOR = 1.898), and wealthier individuals (AOR = 1.650). Conversely, married individuals (AOR = 0.787) and those practicing Christianity (AOR = 0.862) or Islam (AOR = 0.490) had lower odds of use. Regionally, the South-East had the highest odds (AOR = 2.759).

Conclusion:

The study revealed low contraceptive use among women. Older age, higher education, and wealth are associated with higher contraceptive use, whereas marital status, religion, and regional differences pose barriers. There is a need for targeted interventions to address these challenges, particularly for younger, less educated, and socioeconomically disadvantaged groups, and to overcome cultural and religious barriers for improved reproductive health outcomes in Nigeria.

Keywords

Contraceptive use
Family planning
Women of reproductive age

INTRODUCTION

Contraceptive usage is a critical aspect of reproductive health, influencing not only population growth but also women’s autonomy over their fertility decisions. According to the World Health Organization (WHO), of the 1.9 billion women of reproductive age (15–49 years) globally in 2021, 1.1 billion required family planning services. Among them, 874 million individuals were utilizing modern contraceptive methods, whereas 164 million still lacked access to the contraception they needed.[1] Across the globe, the use of contraceptives has been recognized as a key intervention in improving maternal health, reducing unintended pregnancies, and promoting gender equality.[2] Despite worldwide initiatives to improve access to family planning services, the use of contraceptives continues to be limited in numerous low- and middle-income nations, especially across Sub-Saharan Africa.[3,4]

Nigeria, known for having one of the most elevated fertility rates in Sub-Saharan Africa, has consistently recorded low adoption of modern contraceptive methods.[5] In 2023, the Statista Research Department reported that the contraception prevalence rate among women of reproductive age in Nigeria was 18%.[6] There are clear inequalities in contraceptive prevalence among women of reproductive age, with significant variation across different regions and socioeconomic backgrounds due to cultural, religious, and economic influences.[7] Although Nigeria has made strides in increasing access to family planning services, disparities remain, with significant barriers preventing widespread adoption of contraceptives.[5,8]

The role of education, wealth, and regional disparities in contraceptive use has been extensively documented in the literature. Research conducted throughout SubSaharan Africa consistently shows that women with greater educational attainment are more inclined to adopt modern contraceptive methods.[7,9,10] In Ethiopia, for instance, women with secondary or higher education had significantly higher likelihood of using modern contraceptives compared to those with no formal education.[8,11] Similarly, women from higher-income households and those living in urban settings tend to use contraceptives more frequently, largely due to improved access to health services and increased knowledge of family planning choices.[11,12]

Religion and cultural beliefs serve as key drivers in the formation of attitudes toward contraceptive use. In predominantly Muslim countries such as Ethiopia and Kenya, Research indicates that women from Muslim communities are generally less inclined to use modern contraceptives than those from Christian backgrounds, likely due to religious teachings and sociocultural norms that discourage contraceptive use.[7,8] This trend is also observed in Nigeria, where spiritual and cultural influences significantly affect family planning decisions, particularly in the northern regions.[2,5] It is also important to acknowledge the potential influence of social desirability bias in self-reported contraceptive use, as participants may have overreported behaviors perceived as socially acceptable or underreported those considered culturally sensitive.[13]

Regional disparities are a significant challenge in promoting contraceptive use across Nigeria. The country’s diverse geographic and cultural landscape contributes to varying levels of contraceptive uptake, with northern regions reporting lower usage than the southern regions.[7,14] Research has shown that women in urban areas, especially in the South-East and South-West regions, had higher odds of using contraceptives compared to those living in rural or northern parts, where access to family planning services is limited.[5,7] These regional differences highlight the need for targeted interventions that address the unique barriers faced by women in rural and underdeveloped areas.

The fluctuating trends in contraceptive use observed in Nigeria over the past decade underscore the complexity of the issue. For instance, in Yemen, contraceptive use was found to be relatively low, with only 32.8% of married women using modern contraceptive methods.[14] Similarly, in Tanzania, Abeid et al.[15] Reported low uptake of modern contraceptives, with cultural barriers and social stigma acting as significant deterrents. These findings relate to the challenges Nigeria faces in achieving sustained increases in contraceptive use despite ongoing efforts by the government and non-governmental organizations.

Against this backdrop, this study seeks to examine the patterns and factors influencing contraceptive use among women of reproductive age in Nigeria over the past decade (2011–2021). By examining the sociodemographic factors influencing contraceptive behavior and identifying key barriers to uptake, this study contributes to the growing body of evidence on family planning in Nigeria. The findings will contribute valuable information to guide policymakers and healthcare providers to design targeted interventions that promote equitable access to contraception services and improve reproductive health outcomes for women across the country.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Study design

This study employed a retrospective cross-sectional population-based survey design to examine contraceptive use among women of reproductive age in Nigeria from 2011 to 2021. The study used secondary data from the multiple indicator cluster surveys (MICS). This dataset, which represents the entire country, covers various health and demographic indicators, including family planning and contraceptive use. The MICS dataset provided valuable insights into the trends, patterns, and sociodemographic factors associated with the usage of contraceptive over the decade.

Study area and population

This study focuses on Nigeria, the most populous country in Africa, known for its cultural, ethnic, and socioeconomic diversity. Nigeria has six geopolitical zones: North-East, North-West, North-Central, South-West, South-East, and South-South, with 36 states and the Federal Capital Territory (Abuja). The research utilizes MICS datasets from all six zones, covering 2011 to 2021. The study population comprises reproductive women aged 15 to 49, sampled across these geopolitical regions for quantitative analysis.

Sampling technique

The sampling strategy for the MICS surveys involves a multistage cluster sampling design, aiming to achieve nationally representative samples of households across different regions of Nigeria. The data from these surveys encompass various demographic, socioeconomic, and cultural characteristics, allowing for a thorough analysis of current usage of contraceptive and the contributors to it among reproductive aged women in Nigeria.

Study instrument

The MICS utilized a carefully designed questionnaire featuring both open- and closed-ended items to gather primary qualitative data from consenting of reproductive aged women in Nigeria.

Data source

The data were derived from the MICS conducted between 2011 and 2021. The MICS is a standardized survey program developed by United Nations Children’s Fund (UNICEF) to provide internationally comparable, high-quality data. It covers key indicators such as health, education, child protection, and reproductive health. The dataset includes individual-level information on respondents’ sociodemographic characteristics and use of contraception.

Dependent variable

The primary dependent variable was contraceptive use, determined through self-reported usage of either modern or traditional methods.

Independent variables

Key independent variables included:

  • Age: Categorized into four groups (≤ 20, 21–30, 31–40, and ≥ 41).

  • Marital Status: Classified as single, married, or divorced.

  • Educational Attainment: Categorized into no formal education, primary education, and secondary education or higher.

  • Wealth Status: Categorized into poor, middle class, and rich based on household income.

  • Religion: Categorized as Christianity, Islam, and other faiths.

  • Geopolitical Region: The six geopolitical zones in Nigeria.

  • Parity: Whether the respondent had given birth or not.

Ethical procedures

This research utilized secondary data from the MICS, which is publicly accessible and had ethical clearance from Nigerian authorities. MICS secured informed consent from all individuals, while strict protocols were followed to protect their privacy. Authorization to use the MICS dataset was granted through an online application outlining the study’s purpose. Detailed personal information was excluded from the datasets, maintaining respondent anonymity.

Data analysis

Data were analyzed using descriptive and inferential methods, using Microsoft Excel and Statistical Package for Social Sciences Version 28.0. Descriptive statistics provided an overview of sociodemographic characteristics, Logistic regression was applied to examine the relationships between independent variables and the usage of contraceptive, with odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals computed to estimate the likelihood. Statistical significance was established at P-value threshold of < 0.05. The study also analyzed the trend of contraceptive use from 2011 to 2021, highlighting trends and shifts among women of reproductive age. Findings were represented in tables and charts for clarity.

RESULTS

Sociodemographic characteristics of the study participants

The sociodemographic profile of reproductive aged women in the survey is illustrated in Table 1. Participants were mostly aged 21–30 (32.9%), with 64.2% married and 52.2% having secondary education or higher. A third (33.8%) had no formal education. Wealth distribution showed 41.5% were poor, 37.5% rich, and 21.0% middle class. The majority (67.6%) had given birth. Christianity was the most common religion (28.1%), followed by Islam (17.8%). Regional representation was highest in the North-West (22.6%), North-Central (21.1%), and NorthEast (17.6%), while the South-East, South-South, and SouthWest had smaller shares (11.8%, 13.6%, and 13.2%, respectively). Single individuals made up 30.6%, while 5.1% were divorced.

Table 1: Sociodemographic characteristics of the study participants.
Variable Parameter (n=92,853) Frequency Percentage
Age group 20 and below 24912 26.8
21–30 30511 32.9
31–40 23533 25.3
41 and above 13897 15.0
Marital status Single 28393 30.6
Divorced 4737 5.1
Married 59640 64.2
Educational level None 31410 33.8
Primary 13005 14.0
Secondary and above 48429 52.2
Wealth index Poor 38521 41.5
Middle 19479 21.0
Rich 34853 37.5
Religion Christianity 26085 28.1
Islam 16491 17.8
Other religion 15186 16.4
Senatorial region North-Central 19599 21.1
North-East 16355 17.6
North-West 21005 22.6
South-East 10997 11.8
South-South 12665 13.6
South-West 12232 13.2
Ever given birth No 30023 32.3
Yes 62806 67.6

Contraceptive use among women of reproductive age

The use of contraceptives among reproductive age women is shown in Figure 1. The findings reveal that 77,106 (83.0%) no use of contraceptive methods, while 15,747 (17.0%) report using contraceptives.

Contraception usage among reproductive aged women.
Figure 1:
Contraception usage among reproductive aged women.

Trend on the use of contraceptive among women of reproductive age 2011–2021

Figure 2 illustrates the trend of the usage of contraceptive among reproductive age women in Nigeria from 2011 to 2021. It shows from 2011 to 2021, women’s utilization of contraceptives in Nigeria showed a fluctuating trend. In 2011, 19.6% used contraceptives, which declined to 13.8% in 2016/2017. By 2021, usage slightly increased to 17.7%.

Trend of contraception usage among reproductive aged women 2011–2021. The blue line indicates prevalence of contraceptive use
Figure 2:
Trend of contraception usage among reproductive aged women 2011–2021. The blue line indicates prevalence of contraceptive use

Sociodemographic characteristics association with contraceptive use among women of reproductive age

As shown in Table 2, the study revealed that age significantly influenced contraceptive use, with those aged 21–30 having 2.49 times higher odds (AOR = 2.490, 95% CI: 2.289–2.709, P < 0.001), while participants aged 31–40 (AOR = 2.788, 95% CI: 2.535–3.066, P < 0.001) and 41 years and above (AOR = 2.426, 95% CI: 2.184–2.694, P < 0.001) also had increased odds. Marital status impacted contraceptive use, with divorced (AOR = 0.471, 95% CI: 0.404–0.550, P < 0.001) and married individuals (AOR = 0.787, 95% CI: 0.702– 0.881, P < 0.001) having reduced odds compared to singles. Education level played a role as well: participants with primary education (AOR = 1.606, 95% CI: 1.475–1.750, P < 0.001) and secondary or higher education (AOR = 1.898, 95% CI: 1.750–2.058, P < 0.001) had increased odds in contrast to those with no education. Wealth status was another determinant, with middle-wealth participants (AOR = 1.292, 95% CI: 1.202–1.389, P < 0.001) and rich participants (AOR = 1.650, 95% CI: 1.543–1.765, P < 0.001) being more likely to use contraceptives. Religion also mattered, with Christians (AOR = 0.862, 95% CI: 0.796–0.934, P < 0.001) and Muslims (AOR = 0.490, 95% CI: 0.449–0.533, P < 0.001) having lower odds than others. Regional disparities were significant, with South-East (AOR = 2.759, P < 0.001) and South-West participants (AOR = 1.222, P < 0.001) having higher odds of using contraceptives in contrast to North-Central. Participants who had given birth had significantly increased odds of using contraceptives in contrast to those who had never given birth (AOR = 1.977, 95% CI: 1.767–2.213, P < 0.001).

Table 2: Sociodemographic characteristics association with contraceptive use among women of reproductive age.
Variable Don’t use contraceptive n(%) Use contraceptive n(%) COR (95% CI) P-value AOR (95% CI) P-value
Use contraceptive to control pregnancy 77106 (83.0) 15747 (17.0) - - - -
Year
  2011 21747 (80.4) 5299 (19.6) Ref - - -
  2016/2017 26476 (86.2) 4240 (13.8) 0.661 (0.632–0.692) <0.001* 0.520 (0.486–0.556) <0.001*
  2021 28883 (82.3) 6208 (17.7) 0.882 (0.847–0.919) <0.001* 1.153 (1.008–1.319) <0.001*
Age group (years)
  20 and below 23238 (93.3) 1674 (6.7) Ref - - -
  21–30 24800 (81.3) 5711 (18.7) 3.197 (3.019–3.385) <0.001* 2.490 (2.289–2.709) <0.001*
  31–40 18181 (77.3) 5352 (22.7) 4.086 (3.855–4.331) <0.001* 2.788 (2.535–3.066) <0.001*
  41 and above 10887 (78.3) 3010 (21.7) 3.838 (3.600–4.091) <0.001* 2.426 (2.184–2.694) <0.001*
Marital status
  Single 25096 (88.4) 3297 (11.6) Ref - - -
  Divorced 3938 (83.1) 799 (16.9) 1.544 (1.420–1.680) <0.001* 0.471 (0.404–0.550) <0.001*
  Married 48000 (80.5) 11640 (19.5) 1.846 (1.771–1.924) <0.001* 0.787 (0.702–0.881) <0.001*
Education level
  None 27989 (89.1) 3421 (10.9) Ref - - -
  Primary 10554 (81.2) 2451 (18.8) 1.900 (1.796–2.010) <0.001* 1.606 (1.475–1.750) <0.001*
  Secondary and above 38555 (79.6) 9874 (20.4) 2.095 (2.009–2.185) <0.001* 1.898 (1.750–2.058) <0.001*
Wealth index
  Poor 34376 (89.2) 4145 (10.8) Ref - - -
  Middle 16037 (82.3) 3442 (17.7) 1.780 (1.695–1.869) <0.001* 1.292 (1.202–1.389) <0.001*
  Rich 26693 (76.6) 8160 (23.4) 2.535 (2.434–2.640) <0.001* 1.650 (1.543–1.765) <0.001*
Religion
  Christianity 21093 (80.9) 4992 (19.1) 1.142 (1.084–1.203) <0.001* 0.862 (0.796–0.934) <0.001*
  Islam 14551 (88.2) 1940 (11.8) 0.643 (0.604–0.685) <0.001* 0.490 (0.449–0.533) <0.001*
  Other religion 12579 (82.8) 2607 (17.2) Ref - - -
Senatorial region
  North-Central 16018 (81.7) 3581 (18.3) Ref - - -
  North-East 14888 (91.0) 1467 (9.0) 0.441 (0.413–0.470) <0.001* 0.617 (0.562–0.677) <0.001*
  North-West 19370 (92.2) 1635 (7.8) 0.378 (0.355–0.402) <0.001* 0.449 (0.409–0.493) <0.001*
  South-East 7765 (70.6) 3232 (29.4) 1.862 (1.763–1.967) <0.001* 2.759 (2.547–2.989) <0.001*
  South-South 9899 (78.2) 2766 (21.8) 1.250 (1.182–1.321) <0.001* 0.939 (0.871–1.014) <0.001*
  South-West 9166 (74.9) 3066 (25.1) 1.496 (1.417–1.580) <0.001* 1.222 (1.134–1.317) <0.001*
Ever given birth
  No 26907 (89.6) 3116 (10.4) Ref - - -
  Yes 50175 (79.9) 12631 (20.1) 2.174 (2.085–2.267) <0.001* 1.977 (1.767–2.213) <0.001*

Source: Field Survey Conducted in Kano State, *Significant at P<0.05. CI: Confidence interval, AORs: Adjusted odds ratios, COR: Crude odds ratio

Contraceptive methods usage among reproductive aged women

Figure 3 reveals various methods of contraception usage among women of reproductive aged. Among these women in Nigeria, the most commonly used contraceptive methods are fertility awareness-based methods, accounting for 6.18%, followed by short-acting hormonal methods at 5.55%, and barrier methods at 4.07%. Long-acting reversible contraception is used by 2.54%, while other methods and permanent methods are less common, with 0.79% and 0.23% usage, respectively. Spermicidal Methods are the least used, at just 0.03%.

Contraceptive methods use among women of reproductive age.
Figure 3:
Contraceptive methods use among women of reproductive age.

Reasons for not using contraceptive among women of reproductive age

Figure 4 shows the reasons some reproductive aged women do not use contraceptives. Among reproductive aged women in Nigeria who do not use contraceptives, the most common reasons are breastfeeding (4.00%) and infrequent or no sex (3.76%). Other significant reasons include being menopausal (1.89%) and trying to conceive unsuccessfully for 2 years (1.07%). Less common reasons are never menstruating (0.95%), feeling too old (0.64%), and postpartum amenorrhea (0.22%). Fatalistic beliefs (0.10%) and having had a hysterectomy (0.16%) are the least cited reasons.

Reasons for not using contraceptive among reproductive aged women.
Figure 4:
Reasons for not using contraceptive among reproductive aged women.

DISCUSSION

The overall contraceptive rate observed in this study was 17.0%, with a notable fluctuating trend over the period. This prevalence is comparable to that reported in Boah et al.[14] who found 32.8% of women who use contraceptive in Yemen. While the prevalence in Yemen is higher than in Nigeria, both countries demonstrate low overall usage rates. Similarly, Beyene et al.[8] found that modern contraceptive use (MCU) in Ethiopia stayed at 28%, slightly higher than in Nigeria, but still reflecting the general trend of underutilization in Sub-Saharan region of Africa. The study is conducted in conjunction with Kibria et al.[16] who reported a high prevalence of the use of contraception (81.3%) among reproductive aged women in Bangladesh. These differences may be attributed to variations in study populations, cultural contexts, and access to contraceptive services.

The study observed a fluctuating trend in contraception usage among reproductive age women from 2011 to 2021. Contraceptive use decreased from 19.6% in 2011 to 13.8% in 2016/2017, before slightly increasing to 17.7% in 2021. The observed decline in contraceptives aligns with trends reported by Bolarinwa,[5] who noted an surge in contraception usage from 8.25% in 2003 to 12.01% in 2018 in Nigeria. In contrast, Sidibé et al.[17] documented significant increases in MCU from 8.4% in 1999 to 12.8% in 2018 among urban women in Guinea. The slight increase observed in 2021 may indicate the impact of recent interventions to improve family planning outreach or services. Both studies highlight the influence of socioeconomic, educational, and regional factors on contraceptive trends, with fluctuations possibly influenced by changes in policy, provision of family planning options, and sociocultural barriers.

The present study found that age, marital status, education, wealth, religion, and region significantly influenced contraceptive use. Participants aged 21–30, 31–40, and 41 and above were substantially higher likelihood to use contraceptives in contrast to those aged 20 and below, with AORs of 2.490, 2.788, and 2.426, respectively. Women aged 21–30 had the highest odds of using contraceptives, a finding consistent with Mahfouz et al.[12] who discovered that women aged 20–34 had a greater likelihood of using contraceptives in Jazan, Saudi Arabia.

Wealthier individuals had higher odds of contraception usage. Those in the middle wealth category (AOR = 1.292) and the rich (AOR = 1.650) had higher odds than the poor. Higher educational attainment was linked with higher usage of contraceptive. Participants with primary education (AOR = 1.606) and secondary education or higher (AOR = 1.898) had higher chances of using contraceptives in contrast to those without formal education. The increased likelihood of contraception usage among wealthier and more educated women observed in this study mirrors findings from Beyene et al.[8] (2023) and Bolarinwa,[5] where those with higher education and wealth indices had higher odds of adopting contraceptive methods. In Ethiopia, for example, Beyene et al.[8] reported that those with secondary or higher education significantly had lower odds of using modern contraceptives (OR = 1.71).

Conversely, married women in Nigeria showed reduced likelihood of contraceptive use compared to singles AOR = 0.787), which is in contrast to findings by Mankelkl et al.[7] in Kenya, where being married was positively associated with contraceptive use (AOR = 1.593). This difference might be attributed to cultural norms and variations in family planning awareness between the two countries.

Religion played a significant role in determining contraceptive use, with Muslims (AOR = 0.490) and Christians (AOR = 0.862) having lower odds of usage compared to participants of other faiths. This result is consistent with findings from Beyene et al.[8] in Ethiopia, where being Muslim was associated with a reduced likelihood of MCU (AOR = 0.25). Similarly, Mankelkl et al.[7] reported a lower likelihood of contraceptive use among Muslims in Kenya. The lower contraceptive use among religious populations may be attributed to spiritual teachings that discourage contraception use or lack of adequate family planning education within these communities.

This study revealed notable regional differences in contraceptive use, with women in the South-East (AOR = 2.759) and South-West (AOR = 1.222) showing a higher likelihood of contraceptive usage in contrast to their counterparts in the North-Central region. This finding aligns with Bolarinwa,[5] who also highlighted regional inequalities in Nigeria, with women in urban areas having greater links to and higher usage of contraceptives. This result may reflect differences in cultural norms, availability of services, and educational levels across the regions. Sidibé et al.[17] also found that administrative region was associated with MCU in Guinea. The observed regional differences highlight the importance of implementing focused interventions in underdeveloped and rural regions to promote equal access to family planning services.

Participants who had ever given birth had higher odds of using contraceptives (AOR = 1.977). This result links with the work of Oppong et al.,[18] who noted increased the usage of contraceptive among women with prior pregnancies in Ghana. Similarly, Ahinkorah et al.[19] reported that in Mali, Women with four or more children showed a greater inclination to use modern contraceptives (AOR = 1.85). Based on this finding, childbearing experience may likely increase the desire to space or limit further pregnancies.

In this study, the most commonly used contraceptive methods were fertility awareness-based methods, short-term hormonal contraceptives, and physical barrier methods. This research is somewhat consistent with the findings by Hale et al.[20] that short-acting hormonal methods are the most commonly used popular (26.3%) among women in southeastern U.S. states. However, in Ethiopia, injectables were the most commonly used method (32%), as reported by Apanga et al.[9] demonstrating regional variations in preferred contraceptive methods.

The barriers to contraceptive use identified in the Nigerian study, such as breastfeeding and infrequent sexual activity, were also observed in Abeid et al.[15] in Tanzania, where fear of divorce and social stigma were cited as major deterrents to contraceptive adoption. The finding is also consistent with Agyemang et al.[21] who found that perceived side effects and infrequent sexual activity were reasons for non-use among sexually active women in Ghana. Cohen et al.[22] highlighted the importance of counseling to address misconceptions and improve contraceptive initiation. These results indicate that cultural and societal norms significantly influence contraceptive practices, necessitating interventions that address both knowledge gaps and sociocultural beliefs. This finding is supported by Taiwo et al.[23] who found that early marriage, pressure to prove fertility, and strong disapproval of premarital contraception were key cultural barriers, reinforced by family and community actors in Northern Nigeria. These norms significantly discouraged MCU among women.

Strengths and limitations

A substantial sample was used in this study, covering the entire country sample over a decade, providing valuable insights into trends and determinants of contraceptive use among Nigerian women of reproductive age. However, limitations include potential reporting bias and the cross-sectional nature of the data, which limits causal inferences. In addition, the study may be subject to social desirability bias, as participants might have overreported contraceptive use to align with perceived social expectations or underreported non-use due to cultural, religious, or societal stigma. This bias could potentially lead to an inaccurate estimation of actual contraceptive use and should be considered when interpreting the findings.

CONCLUSION

This study provides a comprehensive analysis of the usage of contraceptive and its associated factors among reproductive age women in Nigeria. The findings reveal a relatively low prevalence of contraceptive use (17.0%) despite a steady increase in usage between 2016/2017 and 2021. Sociodemographic factors such as age, marital status, education, wealth status, and religious affiliation significantly influenced contraceptive use. Notably, older age groups, higher educational attainment, and wealthier individuals had higher odds of using contraceptives. Conversely, religious and regional differences contributed to variations in contraceptive uptake. The findings underscore the importance of focused interventions to enhance access to family planning services, particularly for younger, less educated, and socioeconomically disadvantaged groups. Addressing cultural, religious, and social barriers will be crucial in promoting broader contraception usage and supporting reproductive health among reproductive aged women in Nigeria. Future research should also consider the role of social desirability bias in self-reported data, as it may influence the accuracy of contraceptive prevalence estimates.

Acknowledgment:

We would like to express our sincere gratitude to all contributors for their collaborations and support throughout the research.

Author’s contributions:

The final manuscript was reviewed and approved by all authors, who also bear responsibility for the integrity of the data.

Ethical approval:

Ethical approval was not required since this is a secondary data. However, we obtained permision to use the data from NDHS. The Demographic and Health Surveys (DHS) Program, approved on 08/24/2021.

Declaration of patient consent:

Patient’s consent not required as there are no patients in this study.

Conflicts of interest:

There are no conflicts of interest.

Use of artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted technology for manuscript preparation:

The authors confirm that there was no use of artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted technology for assisting in the writing or editing of the manuscript and no images were manipulated using AI.

Financial support and sponsorship: Nil.

References

  1. . Family planning/contraception methods. . Available from: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/family-planning-contraception [Last accessed on 2025 Apr 11]
    [Google Scholar]
  2. , , . Modern contraceptive use among reproductive-aged women in Ghana: Prevalence, predictors, and policy implications. BMC Womens Health. 2018;18:157.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. , , , . Prevalence and predictors of contraceptive use among women of reproductive age in 17 Sub-Saharan African countries: A large population-based study. Sex Reprod Healthc. 2019;21:26-32.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. , , , , . Modern contraceptive use and associated factors among reproductive-age women in Ethiopia: Multilevel analysis evidence from 2019 Ethiopia mini demographic and health survey. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2023;36:2234067.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. . Inequality gaps in modern contraceptive use and associated factors among women of reproductive age in Nigeria between 2003 and 2018. BMC Womens Health. 2024;24:317.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. . Prevalence rate of modern contraceptive method among women in Nigeria as of 2023 by civil status. . :1-3. Available from: https://www.statista.com/statistics/1268145/contraceptive-prevalence-rate-among-women-in-nigeria [Last accessed on 2025 Apr 11]
    [Google Scholar]
  7. , , . Factors associated with modern contraceptive utilization among reproductive age women in Kenya; evidenced by the 2022 Kenyan demographic and health survey. Contracept Reprod Med. 2024;9:10.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. , , . Factors affecting utilization of modern contraceptive methods among women of reproductive age in Ethiopia. PLoS One. 2023;18:e0294444.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. , , , , . Prevalence and factors associated with modern contraceptive use among women of reproductive age in 20 African countries: A large population-based study. BMJ Open. 2020;10:e041103.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. , , , , , , et al. Determinants of modern contraceptive use among married women of reproductive age: A cross-sectional study in rural Zambia. BMJ Open. 2020;10:e030980.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. , . Determinants of the use of modern contraceptives among women of reproductive age group in Ethiopia: A multi-level mixed effects analysis. PLoS One. 2024;19:e0306635.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. , , , , , , et al. Contraceptive use and the associated factors among women of reproductive age in Jazan City, Saudi Arabia: A cross-sectional survey. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023;20:843.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. , . Social desirability bias in family planning studies: A neglected problem. Contraception. 2009;80:108-12.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. , , . Prevalence and factors associated with the utilisation of modern contraceptive methods among married women of childbearing age in Yemen: A secondary analysis of national survey data. BMJ Open. 2023;13:e071936.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. , , , , . Uptake of modern contraceptive methods among women of reproductive age in Chake district-Pemba Tanzania: A descriptive cros-sectional study. Contracept Reprod Med. 2023;8:35.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. , , , , , . Factors affecting contraceptive use among married women of reproductive age in Bangladesh. J Mol Stud Med Res. 2016;2:70-9.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  17. , , , , , , et al. Trends in contraceptive use, unmet need and associated factors of modern contraceptive use among Urban adolescents and young women in Guinea. BMC Public Health. 2020;20:1840.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. , , , , , , et al. Determinants of contraceptive use among sexually active unmarried adolescent girls and young women aged 15-24 years in Ghana: A nationally representative cross-sectional study. BMJ Open. 2021;11:e043890.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. , , , , , , et al. Individual and community-level factors associated with modern contraceptive use among adolescent girls and young women in Mali: A mixed effects multilevel analysis of the 2018 Mali demographic and health survey. Contracept Reprod Med. 2020;5:27.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. , , , . Contraceptive use patterns among women of reproductive age in two Southeastern States. Womens Health Issues. 2020;30:436-45.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. , , , , . Contraceptive use and associated factors among sexually active female adolescents in Atwima Kwanwoma District, Ashanti region-Ghana. Pan Afr Med J. 2019;32:182.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. , , , . Factors associated with contraceptive method choice and initiation in adolescents and young women. J Adolesc Health. 2017;61:454-60.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. , , . Understanding how social norms influence access to and utilization of adolescent sexual and reproductive health services in Northern Nigeria. Front Sociol. 2023;8:865499.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Show Sections